Index
- February 2026 3
- December 2025 4
- November 2025 4
- October 2025 1
- September 2025 1
- August 2025 1
- July 2025 2
- June 2025 1
- May 2025 2
- March 2025 2
- February 2025 2
- January 2025 1
- November 2024 5
- October 2024 2
- August 2024 3
- July 2024 2
- June 2024 4
- May 2024 1
- April 2024 5
- March 2024 5
- February 2024 4
- January 2024 2
- December 2023 5
- November 2023 7
- October 2023 4
- September 2023 5
- August 2023 3
- July 2023 5
- June 2023 3
- May 2023 5
- April 2023 3
- March 2023 5
- February 2023 9
- December 2022 9
- November 2022 3
- October 2022 7
- September 2022 4
- August 2022 8
- July 2022 3
- June 2022 4
- May 2022 9
- April 2022 7
- March 2022 2
- February 2022 5
- December 2021 7
- November 2021 12
- October 2021 9
- September 2021 14
- August 2021 9
- July 2021 5
- June 2021 9
- May 2021 4
- April 2021 3
- March 2021 13
- February 2021 7
- December 2020 1
- November 2020 4
- October 2020 4
- September 2020 5
- August 2020 5
- July 2020 8
- June 2020 5
- May 2020 11
- April 2020 6
- March 2020 5
- February 2020 3
- January 2020 1
- December 2019 1
- November 2019 3
- October 2019 2
- September 2019 2
- August 2019 4
- July 2019 2
- June 2019 2
- May 2019 5
- April 2019 8
- March 2019 2
- February 2019 3
- December 2018 1
- November 2018 9
- October 2018 2
- September 2018 5
- August 2018 3
- July 2018 3
- June 2018 2
- May 2018 5
- April 2018 7
- March 2018 3
- February 2018 4
- December 2017 3
- November 2017 7
- October 2017 4
- September 2017 3
- August 2017 3
- July 2017 1
- June 2017 3
- May 2017 2
- April 2017 3
- March 2017 4
- February 2017 3
- January 2017 1
- December 2016 3
- November 2016 4
- October 2016 2
- September 2016 1
- August 2016 3
- July 2016 1
- June 2016 3
- May 2016 3
- April 2016 4
- March 2016 4
- February 2016 3
- January 2016 1
- December 2015 2
- November 2015 4
- October 2015 4
- September 2015 4
- August 2015 3
- July 2015 6
- June 2015 6
When is it illegal to attend a protest? Contempt of court and unlawful assembly following Commissioner of Police v Naser
Henry Chen and Cherry Tang
In this post, we challenge the comments made by the NSW Court of Appeal about the potential criminal consequences of an order ‘prohibiting’ a protest under s 25 of the Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW) (Summary Offences Act) in Commissioner of Police (NSW Police Force) v Naser [2025] NSWCA 224 (Naser).
On 1 October 2025, Palestine Action Group notified NSW Police of their intention to hold a protest for 40,000 people at the Sydney Opera House on 12 October 2025, after ‘two years of genocide’ in Gaza (Opera House protest). In response, NSW Police applied to the Court of Appeal for a prohibition order, which the Court ultimately granted.
The proposed Opera House protest followed an earlier protest organised by Palestine Action Group on 3 August 2025 on the Sydney Harbour Bridge (Harbour Bridge protest), at which protesters enjoyed legal immunity from offences relating to unlawful assembly or obstruction after Rigg J refused to make a prohibition order sought by NSW Police: Commissioner of Police v Lees [2025] NSWSC 858 (Lees). While the expected turnout at the Harbour Bridge protest was estimated at 10,000 and later revised to 50,000, the protest was ultimately attended by up to 90,000 people (according to NSW Police) or 300,000 people (according to Palestine Action Group).
The Harbour Bridge protest was halted mid-way and turned around for reasons of public safety. Following the protest, Assistant Commissioner Peter McKenna reflected that while the police operation was a success in that no one was hurt, ‘gee whiz, I wouldn't like to try and do this every Sunday at that short notice.’